Self-Directed Learning Strategies in Higher Education: A Combination of Theory and Practice

Shodiyeva Matluba  Jo‘rayevna

doi:10.51699/cajotas.v7i1.1627

Shodiyeva Matluba Jo‘rayevna Professor at Renaissance University of Education, Doctor of educational sciences (DSc)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51699/cajotas.v7i1.1627

Keywords: Self-Regulation, Self-Regulated Learning, Metacognitive Strategies, Motivation, Higher Education, Reflection, Learning Independence

Abstract

This paper explores theoretical and practical aspects of self-directed learning (SDL) and self-regulated learning (SRL) and takes into account an important shift in the ways that students are viewed: from passive receivers of information to active constructors of knowledge during their learning process, particularly in higher education. Objective: Despite a shift towards more autonomous learning supported by gradually designed digitalized learning pathways, the potential of introducing reflective self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies systematically in university curricula to enhance specific metacognitive and motivational skills remains largely unsolved. This research is theoretical-descriptive, its major component devoted to comparative analytical study of international and local educational practice and examines the key elements of self-regulated learning such as metacognitive, motivational and behavioral regulation and its pedagogical implications. Findings suggest that SRL-related strategies (reflective journaling, time management, goal-setting, etc.) improve student academic performance by approximately 15–25%, foster autonomy, and increase students’ psychological resilience. Finally, the article recommends incorporating self-regulated learning into the design of instruction as a way of enhancing learner self-efficacy and also to more completely meet the needs of higher education in an era when lifelong learning is an increasingly salient goal. These implications highlight the need for (1) teacher training guided by SRL research, (2) assessment tools that foster reflection, and (3) digital technologies (AI learning analytics, e-portfolios) aligned with personalized learning pathways. SRL interventions in the different disciplines should be tested in future empirical studies to examine their effectiveness regarding the cognitive and emotional development of students over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977. [Online]. Available: https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/news/pdfs/Bandura%201977.pdf

B. J. Zimmerman, Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780121098902500317

B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, Eds., Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.

P. R. Pintrich, “Developing a framework for evaluating motivation and self-regulated learning among university learners,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 385–407, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene, Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-45259-000

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Future of Education and Skills: 21st-Century Competencies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Human needs, goal pursuits, and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

M. S. Knowles, Self-Directed Learning: A Manual for Learners and Educators. New York: Association Press, 1975.

M. Boekaerts, “Current perspectives on self-regulated learning,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 445–457, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2

B. J. Zimmerman, “Overview of becoming a self-regulated learner,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

G. Schraw, K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley, “Encouraging self-regulation in science education: Integrating metacognition into learning perspectives,” Research in Science Education, vol. 36, nos. 1–2, pp. 111–139, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

S. G. Paris and A. H. Paris, “Applying self-regulated learning theories in classroom contexts,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 89–101, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4

P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, “Learning as a self-regulated process,” in Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 277–304.

Panadero, “Self-regulated learning: Review of six theoretical models and directions for new research,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, p. 422, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

A. R. Artino, “Cognitive load theory and learner experience: A concise overview for education professionals,” AACE Journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 425–439, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26020